Advocate Health's AI-drafted prior authorizations cut pharmacy staff time from up to 25 minutes to about 5
Advocate Health pharmacies use AI inside Epic to draft answers to payer prior authorization questionnaires from the patient record. Staff review and submit the drafts. Requests reach payers about a day sooner on average.
- Organization
- Advocate Health
- Industry
- Healthcare
- When
- May 2026
- Evidence
- Press report
- Agents and tools
- Epic
Reported outcome
Staff time per prior authorization fell from up to 25 minutes to about 5, and requests reach payers an average of one full day sooner, per an Epic case study as reported.
- up to 25 min → about 5 min (as reported)Staff time per request
- about 1 day sooner on average (as reported)Submission speed
- specialty, outpatient and centralized retail pharmacySettings
Caveats
Reported by a news outlet, usually based on company statements.
- We could not open the original Epic case study. The numbers come from a news report that summarizes it.
- Epic sells the tool, so the case study is vendor material.
- 'Up to 25 minutes' is the high end before. The report gives no average baseline or method.
- The AI drafts answers; it does not decide or submit. People still review every request.
What the agent does
Prior authorization means getting a payer's approval before a prescription is covered. Payers send questionnaires. Before, Advocate Health pharmacy staff wrote the answers by hand, often over phone and fax.
Now an AI tool inside Epic, the health record system, pulls clinical facts from the patient's record and drafts answers that match the payer's questions. Pharmacy staff review the draft and submit it.
What happened
Advocate piloted the tool in some areas, then expanded it to specialty, outpatient and centralized retail pharmacy. As reported, the time per request fell from up to 25 minutes to about 5, and requests reach payers about one day sooner on average.
What to copy
- Start with forms that ask for facts already in your records.
- Let the AI draft, and keep a person as the one who submits.
- Pilot in one area, then expand.
Starter prompt
Written by us, not by Advocate Health or Epic. Use only with approved, compliant tools for patient data.
Payer questionnaire: {questions}
Patient record excerpts: {record_excerpts}
For each question, draft an answer using only the record.
Quote the record line you used, with its date.
If the record does not answer a question, write "NOT FOUND - staff to complete".
Do not guess clinical facts.
Sources
- AI Prior Authorization Cuts Advocate Health Delays — DistilINFO, May 12, 2026
Added Nov 2, 2026 · Sources last checked Nov 2, 2026. Spotted an error? Send a correction.
Get new use cases weekly
One short email. Sources included.
Related use cases
Carta Healthcare's Claude-based Lighthouse cut clinical registry abstraction time by up to 66%
Carta reports up to 66% less time for clinical data abstraction, 50%+ cost savings on that work, and 98-99% inter-rater reliability.
Kaiser Permanente rolled out Abridge ambient AI notes to 24,000+ doctors
One of the largest generative AI rollouts in healthcare: 24,000+ physicians across ~40 hospitals and 600+ offices.
eSentire's Claude agents run 120,000+ security investigations a year; experts agree 90%+ of the time
Over 120,000 autonomous investigations in 12 months, 6-minute average investigation, and above 90% alignment with top SOC experts on a sampled review.